He looks like such a fine, upstanding citizen
You know, if you’re going to do this kind of crap to yourself, don’t you think you should find a better hobby than crime? There is like NO chance of mistaken identity when you look like this. Even eyewitness testimony would satisfy me if I was on the jury, and normally I don’t like it.
This guy was born in 1981. According to the Dayton Daily News, he is now being …
Held in custody of Montgomery County, Ohio, Sheriff on 12/11/09 at 8:42 PM. Fifth Degree Felony – Obstructing Justice (Pending); Second Degree Misdemeanor – Resisting Arrest (Pending); Third Degree Felony – Robbery (Pending); Third Degree Felony – Abduction (Pending).
December 13th, 2009 at 10:08
he is expressing his individuality through the creative use of ink on his body. the problem is not that he chose a life of crime the problem is that once he has inked himself like this mainstream employers will discriminate against him and he will not get a job. it is a shame that we allow this kind of discrimination. if we were more progressive, ink would not deny us a good job. sorry but society is to blame for his choice of vocation.
December 13th, 2009 at 14:28
This is a joke, right “holly?” It has to be. I mean come on, you cannot possibly be serious.
Even if — and it’s a stretch, but whatever — even if we stipulate that his tattooing made it impossible for him to get a good job and thus he had no alternative than to turn to a life of crime … who the hell made him get the tattoos in the first place? Who held him down and forced him to do this to himself, thereby rendering himself unemployable?
Besides, I reject your premise in the first place. I know several people who are tattooed — a few of them rather heavily and prominently — and not a one of them is unable to hold down a good job as a result of their ink.
Either you’re a total moron or your comment was a lame attempt at a joke. Which is it, “holly?”
December 13th, 2009 at 14:43
I get the feeling that Ariadne and Holly are the same asswipe. If so then please expire soon, you stupid troll bitch.
December 13th, 2009 at 14:58
Totally different IPs. Two idiots, not one.
December 14th, 2009 at 12:15
I take it Ariadne was blocked?
Any way there is another case that related that a friend told me about.
(and I’m being lazy and just copying her text)
Makeup hides neo-Nazi’s swastika in courtAccording to the story, a judge ordered the tattoos, including a swastika, barbed wire and an obscene word, to be covered using make-up during trial, out of concern that seeing them might prejudice jurors against the defendant.
Gee, ya think?
What really gets me is that, again, according to the story, the idiot had the tattoos in question added after his offense, while in prison awaiting trial, and then decided that maybe they might not make the best impression in court.
Oh, really? People don’t like swastikas? Gee, never thought of that.
*facepalm*
Gotta love stupid criminals.
December 14th, 2009 at 12:16
crap the link didn’t post. . .
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5B74FP20091208