Found it in my drafts folder today

This is a few days old now — it’s from January 26 and 27 — but still worth publishing IMHO.  Found it over on Andrew Breitbart’s Big Journalism site:

Fact Check: Reich Claims Non-Existent Fox News Led Conservative Charge in 1994

Former Obama economic advisor, Clinton Secretary of Labor, and Berkely Prof. Robert Reich claimed yesterday in his column at Salon.com that Fox News played a role in the conservative resurgence of 1994:

In December 1994, Bill Clinton proposed a so-called middle-class bill of rights including more tax credits for families with children, expanded retirement accounts, and tax-deductible college tuition. Clinton had lost his battle for healthcare reform. Even worse, by that time the Dems had lost the House and Senate. Washington was riding a huge anti-incumbent wave. Right-wing populists were the ascendancy, with Newt Gingrich and Fox News leading the charge. Bill Clinton thought it desperately important to assure Americans he was on their side.

But Prof. Reich overlooked one minor detail: Fox News Channel’s first broadcast wasn’t until October 7, 1996.

The plan for FNC wasn’t even outlined until January of 1996, so what could explain such a patently false claim?  Is the professor suggesting that even in 1994, Fox News’ imminence did in fact play a role in the political upheaval of that year?  Or is this a moment where Fox Derangement Syndrome enters the realm of full-blown paranoia?

Either way, where was Salon on this one to save Reich from himself?  And would Prof. Reich tolerate fact-checking this poor from his college students?

This man is a professor of public policy at UC Berkeley.  And we wonder why California turns out so many nutjob LLLs?

Incidentally, as noted on Big Journalism –

Update 1/27 4:47pm PST: Salon corrected the mistake.  Reich’s article was cross-posted at Huffington Post (yet to be corrected) and at RobertReich.org, where the professor took out the error and replaced it with a dig at Fox News.

I’ll update that to note that Huffington Post corrected it as well — they removed “and Fox News” after the mention of Newt Gingrich.

Big Journalism

tags, , , , ,

2 Responses to “Keep forgetting to post this”

  1. Manny Says:

    1. Just because Fox News did not exist as Fox News in 1994 does not mean they did not exist under another guise.
    2. The people who comprise the entity of Fox News were definitely active in 1994, laying the ground work for their upcoming merger.

    =3. The professor’s statement was factually and literally correct even if not quite accurate. Quit looking for conspiracies under every rock.

  2. Billy Says:

    You’re so stupid, your crap is not even worth the time it takes to debunk. Do the world a favor and die very soon, loser.

Comments? Opinions? Share 'em!

Comments will be closed on Thursday, 3 February 2011.