Mar 19 2011

My Mother-In-Law will be pleased…

… to know that accounting is an “inexact science.”

This happened back in November — I’m sure several of my liberal friends will be shocked, since they seem to think I spend my every waking moment monitoring FOX News — but I only just learned about it via Michelle Malkin today.  Michelle was commenting about the 2.3 trillion dollars by which the Obama administration has underestimated the deficit.

Michelle made reference to a November 2010 observation by Doug Powers, wherein he said …

President Obama brushed off criticism over his administration’s inaccurate reporting on job creation Wednesday, telling Fox News the accounting is an “inexact science” and that any errors are a “side issue” when compared with the goal of turning the economy around.

This from the same man who in a February 2010 speech to congress said:

I have told each member of my Cabinet as well as mayors and governors across the country that they will be held accountable by me and the American people for every dollar they spend.

Doesn’t really seem fair, does it, to hold people accountable for every dollar when accounting is such an inexact science.

The Powers That BeFOX News


Mar 28 2010

Healthcare Bill

To answer your questions …

People keep asking me why I’m not blogging about the healthcare bill now that its passed and been signed.  Some people have asked if I’m too upset about it to blog it.  Others are convinced I am not complaining because I am chagrined by “my side” losing and am now hanging my head in virtual shame.  One email asked if I was going to slit my wrists or leave the country.  Another said “I bet you’re embarassed [sic] now because now the US has health care and despite all your doom and gloom predictions, the planet hasn’t exploded.”  One of the funniest said “Bush had 8 yrs to fix education and couldn’t do it but in a year Obama managed to give free health care to the children of the world! Fuck Bush!”

Someone who has known me for more than 20 years said, in part, “I suspect you’re like me right now, kind of sitting back and waiting for reality to start hitting … once they understand the true magnitude of what he’s done, they’ll realize this really wasn’t a good thing … how long before they realize just what this is going to do to the national debt, to medicare, to taxes… I wonder how many years it will be before it starts being undone or will it be too late?  Will we just become the USSA?”  (United Socialist States of America)

No, I don’t have head-in-sand syndrome.  I know it passed, and no, I didn’t somehow miss the fact that Obama signed it.  I’ve been answering individual emails and when I realized today that I was beginning to cut and paste portions of my earlier replies to others because it was easier than retyping it all, I decided it was time to just get on the blog and start answering the questions en masse as it were.
Continue reading


Feb 14 2010

Your tax dollars at work?

So follow me on this one …

Our esteemed President, Barack Obama, wants to dramatically increase federal funding for global warming research. Very dramatically: the federal budget for 2011 proposes $2.6 billion for the Global Change Research Program, a 21 percent boost over 2010. This will bring funding to a level higher than under any past administration since 1989, when global warming first received federal budget funds.

It’s also interesting to note — though only as a matter of trivia, as it is totally irrelevant to the discussion — that when one takes into account the additional funding for climate science that is apportioned to a number of federal agencies (like the EPA, the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation) overall climate funding is approximately as large as the entire federal government’s budget in 1932 — $3.994 billion. [FOX News]

Back on topic, however …

Despite the fact that 70% of the nation is covered in snow right now, despite the ongoing series of revelations about doctored research statistics by scientists, attempts to discredit skeptics of global warming science, and disclosures that the U.N.’s own Nobel-Prize-winning climate science research was based on faulty research about the Amazon rain forest and Himalayan ice caps, despite all that … Obama wants almost 3 billion dollars for continued climate research.  The phrase “tossing good money after bad” certainly comes to my mind.

I would like to believe that this latest admission will have some impact on his decision, but I’m not holding my breath:

The academic at the centre of the ‘Climategate’ affair, whose raw data is crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble ‘keeping track’ of the information.

Colleagues say that the reason Professor Phil Jones has refused Freedom of Information requests is that he may have actually lost the relevant papers.

Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be’.

The data is crucial to the famous ‘hockey stick graph’ used by climate change advocates to support the theory.

Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.

And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.

The Daily Mail has more on this.

What’s it going to take for President Obama to wake up and smell the coffee here?  How many more revelations and admissions need to be made before he acknowledges the government is wasting our money?


Jun 10 2009

The older I get, the more I like Rush

Anybody tells you there’s no such thing as evolution is a liar

Evolution is defined as a process in which something passes by degrees to a different stage (especially a more advanced or mature stage).  This means that I am, myself, living proof of evolution.

In 1990, I thought Rush Limbaugh was about the biggest jerk this side of the equator.  He can still make me cringe from time to time, but you know, coming up on 20 years later I have begun to more and more appreciate Limbaugh’s judgment and candor.  Here’s an example of why.   (Note this is excerpted from Rush Limbaugh’s opening monologue Monday, June 8.)

They go on to make the point that Barack Obama has become America’s Gorbachev. Gorbachev presided over the destruction of the Soviet Union, and Barack Obama is presiding over the destruction of the United States of America. There is no other way to say this. Given the economic numbers that we have — given the 25-year record unemployment, given that there is no positive economic news anywhere — wouldn’t somebody with common sense and a brain think that after… Let’s count ‘em up here. This is just five months, and then we add October, November… After eight months of an amount of spending that equals $11 trillion and an over $2 trillion budget deficit this year — after eight months of stimulating the economy in ways that have never been done, under the theory that this was the only way to revive our US economy — isn’t it time to stop and say, “Wait a minute! The political solutions not only aren’t working, they are making it worse”?

Eight months, and this kind of spending is enough of a proving ground for me. The sad fact is, I and many of you in this audience don’t need a proving ground because we have history on our side. We know where this kind of thing has been tried structurally and philosophically and in reality and we know the disaster that awaits. It hasn’t worked any time it’s been tried. The only reason somebody in this day and age thinks it will work is because of the personality of Obama. The personality. The cult-like followers of one man think that it is possible because he’s a different kind of guy. I need to find an audio sound bite here for you. It’s from state-run Newsweek. Let’s see. I want you to grab audio sound bite number eight, Mister Broadcast Engineer. Back in 2007, Evan Thomas of Newsweek magazine was asked, “Don’t you guys think the you’re being awfully hard on George W. Bush?” “No, no, no, no, no,” said Evan Thomas of Newsweek, “Our job is to bash the president. That’s what the media does. Our job is to bash the president.” Now Newsweek is government-run media. Evan Thomas Friday night on MSNBC got a question. The question was this. “You remember 1984? That wasn’t 100 years ago. Reagan, World War II the sense of us as the good guys in the world. How are we doing?” Listen to this answer.

He’s bringing nobody together, but there you have it from government-run Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: “He’s a god.” Obama is a god. Reagan was parochial. Reagan, he only cared about America, but Obama’s above that now. He’s not chauvinistic. We’re just provincial. Ronald Reagan was not provincial. Ronald Reagan understood American exceptionalism, Ronald Reagan understood America’s greatness, Ronald Reagan understood America’s role in the world for good. Mr. Thomas, Barack Obama sees America’s role in the world as not good. It is offensive to the sensibilities of millions of people to hear a member of State-Run Media refer to a half black-half white human being with no experience running anything of substance referred to as a god. He may be president of the United States, but he’s a god. Sadly, too many people look at him that way, which is why they can watch with their own eyes and experience with their own lives the destruction of their own lives economically, and still find a way to hold the man responsible for it, Barack Obama, blameless.

If I might correct the architect of the collapse of the Soviet Union, well, the partial architect, Ronald Reagan helped as well, that would be Mikhail Gorbachev. Mr. Gorbachev, Russia was destroyed, the Soviet Union was destroyed by freedom; it was destroyed by capitalism; it was destroyed by American exceptionalism. Socialism as an opponent to capitalism is what died with the Soviet Union. Communism as an opponent to capitalism is what died. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what Barack Obama inherited. Barack Obama continually, childishly, immaturely blames predecessors for all of the mess that he and he alone has compounded. If he wants to talk about what he inherited, I’d like to put it down on the record what he inherited. The problem is he inherited it temporarily. He’s in the process of destroying it.

Barack Obama inherited greatness in a nation. He inherited the birthplace of the individual. He inherited the defender of liberty at home and abroad, the United States of America. He inherited the opportunity to lead a nation of sheer exceptionalism, a nation of equal opportunity, a nation which featured its citizens the right to fail and to try and try and try again. He inherited the financial center and capital of the world. Barack Obama inherited the country that has successfully championed capitalism and widespread prosperity. He inherited a nation which liberated billions of people who lived in oppression. He also inherited great responsibility. He inherited the responsibility to lead this great nation, the world’s lone superpower, a nation oriented toward the good of humanity. He inherited the responsibility to preserve and strengthen the free markets and economies that made this the greatest nation in the history of human civilization. He inherited the responsibility to continue the philosophy and the tradition of a country founded on Judeo-Christian morals, ethics, and principles.

He inherited the Constitution of the United States. He did not claim the right to remake it, to rewrite it, to change it. He swore to uphold it. And he’s in the process of wreaking as much damage to the Constitution as he can get away with, with nominations like Sonia Sotomayor, as he is wreaking damage to the US economy. Barack Obama did not inherit a mess. He leads a mess. He inherited the United States of America, where anything is possible. And greatness has been delivered to the world time after time in the form of private sector inventions, innovations, advancements in products that improve people’s lives for over 200 years. He inherited a country of individuals energized by their liberty and strengthened by their character. Barack Obama inherited the leadership of the greatest collection of human beings in the history of human existence.

And what has he done with this inheritance? He has run around the world and apologized at every stop he makes for what he considers the sins, the immorality, and the unjust unfairness of the way he perceives the United States of America. He inherited a country that liberates the oppressed, as I said. He inherited the greatest economy in history. He inherited that, nothing more, nothing less, plus the Constitution. There is nothing to apologize for. It is childish, it’s babyish, it is immature, it is unbecoming anyone who holds the office of president of the United States to run around crying like a baby while lying about the mess he inherited, because he didn’t inherit a mess. He inherited years and decades of stewardship from the Oval Office of the greatest nation in history. In his mind, he inherited a flawed social experiment. He has now made the mess that is the United States economy. He is making a mess of United States foreign policy.

There is a lot to be proud of this country, but you don’t hear much about that from the Oval Office or wherever Obama’s teleprompter happens to be planted. We don’t hear people in his administration talk about how proud they are of this country and how proud they are of the people who make this country work. There is a lot of work to be done, but not the way Obama is proceeding. He is creating more work for future generations to reclaim their birthright that is the greatness of this country. Barack Obama is destroying what others before him preserved and expanded upon. He’s now saying, we can no longer postpone health care, just like we couldn’t postpone stimulus, we couldn’t postpone TARP, now can’t postpone health care. If he gets what he and the Democrats want, single payer national health care, your kids and grandkids can forget the American dream as you and your grandparents knew it.

You can read the entire discussion here.


May 8 2009

Well, the news sux0r

What a craptastic news day this is turning out to be

As I write this, I have fourteen browser tabs open.  Most (not all) of these tabs represent a story I’ve read in the news and kept open so that I could blog about it.  The problem is that all of them are depressing, upsetting, irritating, saddening … supply a negative term here, it’ll probably fit at least one of them.

Here’s what we’ve got:

(stories under the fold about: Obama & fallen cops, Liz Edwards & It, Arlen’s Payoff, Pelosi Knew All Along)

Continue reading


May 5 2009

Aww, come on, forget the deficit

Ignore the doom and gloom all around you

And have a laugh!

funny pictures of cats with captions
see more Lolcats and funny pictures

Or two.

funny pictures of cats with captions
see more Lolcats and funny pictures

—————-
Now playing: Cats In The Kettle
via FoxyTunes


May 5 2009

No, wait, this is sleazier!

I stand corrected

Get this!  Just a short while ago, I declared Arlen Specter’s “vote me back in office or you’ll kill someone!” non-fundraising fundraising page the height of sleaze.  I was mistaken.

This is even better, really:

Jack Kemp would still be alive if the federal government had done a better job funding cancer research, Sen. Arlen Specter said Sunday, one day after Kemp, the 1996 Republican vice presidential nominee and former congressman, died of cancer.

I bet Jack Kemp’s family are happy to know that the federal government is to blame for their loved one’s death.  Now they know who to sue!  But wait, that’s just a little piece of it.  Here’s the rest:

“Frankly, I was disappointed that the Republican Party didn’t want me as their candidate. But as a matter of principle, I’m becoming much more comfortable with the Democrats’ approach,” Specter said. “And one of the items that I’m working on … is funding for medical research. I’ve been the spear carrier to increase medical research.”

Specter added: “If we had pursued what President Nixon declared in 1970 as the war on cancer, we would have cured many strains. I think Jack Kemp would be alive today. And that research has saved or prolonged many lives, including mine.”

Specter has been treated for Hodgkin’s disease, a cancer of the lymphatic system. Through his Web site, specterforthecure.com, the senator has called for more federal resources and funding to be directed toward medical research.

Specter on Sunday touted his record of increasing funding for research for the National Institutes of Health. His Web site details the strides he’s made — “doubling the nation’s health research budget” and helping include funding for the NIH in the stimulus bill.

But his claims about Nixon’s “war on cancer” and Kemp, the former Buffalo Bills MVP who died of an undisclosed cancer after a lengthy illness, raised eyebrows — since the government has devoted billions to cancer research since Nixon’s call in 1971 for a campaign to find a cancer cure.

The National Cancer Institute had a $4.8 billion budget in fiscal 2008. Since the early ’70s, the National Cancer Institute’s budgets have totaled more than $80 billion, according to historical budget statistics.

What a sanctimonious little prick.

FOX News

Hey, Arlen, this song is just for you.
—————-
Now playing: 70′s Music Explosion – Mr. Big Stuff
via FoxyTunes


Apr 29 2009

Another 100 Day Factoid

Because “full disclosure” is so damned much fun!

This one’s from the Heritage Foundation as well.

  • Debt for Your Family: The President came into office promising a “net spending cut” then signed the stimulus bill, which will dump $9,400 in new debt on the average American household. Under CBO’s estimate, if some programs become permanent, this would skyrocket to $26,600 per American household.
  • Failed Logic: In his first 100 days, President Obama will have quadrupled the budget deficit he inherited while pledging to cut it in half, which would still leave a deficit double the size it was in January 2009.
  • And Even More Debt: In his first 100 days, President Obama proposed a budget that would dump a staggering $9.3 trillion in new debt—$68,000 per household—into the laps of American children. This is more debt than has been accumulated by all previous Presidents in American history combined.

Seriously, you should go read the entire article. It’s not that long.

—————-
Now playing: Jimmy Wayne – Do You Believe Me Now
via FoxyTunes


Apr 29 2009

100 Days: Highlight

Just one little bitty quick fact about The One’s first 100 days …

Remember the Earmarks?

President Obama came into office pledging to “slash earmarks to no greater than 1994 levels” of 1,318 per budget. In his first 100 days, he signed an omnibus spending bill that contained 9,287 earmarks, the second most in U.S. history, including funding for tattoo removal and a Buffalo Bill museum.

Source: Heritage Foundation

—————-
Now playing: Tom Petty – Too Good To Be True
via FoxyTunes